Peter H.M. Brooks
2006-04-18 09:40:08 UTC
I've encountered the expression before, but was reminded of it in the
latest news on the Zuma trial. Having a hunt to find its origin, I
found mainly South African legal sites - is this a phenomenon of
Google, or is the term largely a South African legal term? If so, does
it come from Roman or Dutch law?
Looking wider, there is only one reference to this term in the OED (but
there is one, suggesting that it is an English term in origin) '1796
C.SMITH Marchmont IV. 423. The first head of his argument, which he
divided sermon-wise.'.
Is the image of arguments as a hydra with many heads, though,
presumably, in law, without the supposition that two grow in place of
any one that is severed?
latest news on the Zuma trial. Having a hunt to find its origin, I
found mainly South African legal sites - is this a phenomenon of
Google, or is the term largely a South African legal term? If so, does
it come from Roman or Dutch law?
Looking wider, there is only one reference to this term in the OED (but
there is one, suggesting that it is an English term in origin) '1796
C.SMITH Marchmont IV. 423. The first head of his argument, which he
divided sermon-wise.'.
Is the image of arguments as a hydra with many heads, though,
presumably, in law, without the supposition that two grow in place of
any one that is severed?