Discussion:
Mr. Brooks
(too old to reply)
Peter H.M. Brooks
2007-08-07 18:42:29 UTC
Permalink
I couldn't really avoid going to see this - not that it is that rare
for people to be my namesake. They should have called it 'Mr. Smith'
or 'Mr. Wong' and they'd have had a much bigger audience just for that
reason.

On the whole I enjoyed this film, it jogged along in a fairly
predictable fashion, but it was fun going along with it all. The most
remarkable thing about it was the actor Kevin Costner - I'd seen him
in a few films before and wondered why anybody hired him because he
was so utterly wooden. I truly didn't believe him capable of acting at
all. I wouldn't say he was brilliant in this film either, but,
amazingly, quite a few times he acted well enough that you didn't
think 'oh, it's that prat Costner', which made the film a lot more
enjoyable.

Also the actress Julia Roberts was less disturbing to look at. In the
past I've always wondered if she had a hare-lip or some other problem
with her mouth that distracted me from anything she said. With age her
lips have thinned down and, though she looks a bit gaunt, she doesn't
look abnormal, so that helped too. Her acting was fairly
underwhelming, but this is the first time I've had a chance to watch
her act.

The plot was OK, and I don't want to give anything away to anybody who
might want to watch it, but I wasn't sure what the imaginary friend
was supposed to be about. Was it supposed to be a schizophrenic
delusion - which wouldn't fit well with anything else? Was it supposed
to be some sort of spook - in which case, why didn't we have any
explanation of why there should be a spook about? Was it, rather,
supposed to be some sort of view of an old fashioned id/ego problem?

This confused matters further as I wasn't clear if there was some sort
of sub-plot in which psychopathy was supposed to be heritable -
because it wasn't clear if it was supposed to be psychopathy or
schizophrenia or something completely different.

I felt that whoever was responsible for plotting or giving expert
advice was hired very cheaply.

I suppose it is possible to have your own private cemetery. I wonder
why there isn't a bigger second hand market for them if they are so
handy.
Peter H.M. Brooks
2007-08-07 19:01:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter H.M. Brooks
Also the actress Julia Roberts
I found out why her lips looked better - it wasn't Julia Roberts, it
was Demi Moore. Maybe that's why she doesn't have her lips fixed - so
that you can distinguish one mediocre Yank actress from another...
M.Balarama
2007-08-07 20:05:13 UTC
Permalink
I was surprised by how well done the movie was...It was enjoyable.
Michael
Post by Peter H.M. Brooks
I couldn't really avoid going to see this - not that it is that rare
for people to be my namesake. They should have called it 'Mr. Smith'
or 'Mr. Wong' and they'd have had a much bigger audience just for that
reason.
On the whole I enjoyed this film, it jogged along in a fairly
predictable fashion, but it was fun going along with it all. The most
remarkable thing about it was the actor Kevin Costner - I'd seen him
in a few films before and wondered why anybody hired him because he
was so utterly wooden. I truly didn't believe him capable of acting at
all. I wouldn't say he was brilliant in this film either, but,
amazingly, quite a few times he acted well enough that you didn't
think 'oh, it's that prat Costner', which made the film a lot more
enjoyable.
Also the actress Julia Roberts was less disturbing to look at. In the
past I've always wondered if she had a hare-lip or some other problem
with her mouth that distracted me from anything she said. With age her
lips have thinned down and, though she looks a bit gaunt, she doesn't
look abnormal, so that helped too. Her acting was fairly
underwhelming, but this is the first time I've had a chance to watch
her act.
The plot was OK, and I don't want to give anything away to anybody who
might want to watch it, but I wasn't sure what the imaginary friend
was supposed to be about. Was it supposed to be a schizophrenic
delusion - which wouldn't fit well with anything else? Was it supposed
to be some sort of spook - in which case, why didn't we have any
explanation of why there should be a spook about? Was it, rather,
supposed to be some sort of view of an old fashioned id/ego problem?
This confused matters further as I wasn't clear if there was some sort
of sub-plot in which psychopathy was supposed to be heritable -
because it wasn't clear if it was supposed to be psychopathy or
schizophrenia or something completely different.
I felt that whoever was responsible for plotting or giving expert
advice was hired very cheaply.
I suppose it is possible to have your own private cemetery. I wonder
why there isn't a bigger second hand market for them if they are so
handy.
Peter H.M. Brooks
2007-08-07 20:32:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.Balarama
I was surprised by how well done the movie was...It was enjoyable.
Yes, I agree, that is the odd thing about it, despite its flaws, it
works.

Loading...